MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404444192 · doi:10.1177/87552930241292348

Negative stiffness device for seismic protection of MDOF yielding fixed base structures: Experimental and analytical study

2024· article· en· W4404444192 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEarthquake Spectra · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsIntecsea (Canada)
FundersNational Science Foundation
KeywordsStructural engineeringStiffnessBase (topology)Geotechnical engineeringBase isolationSeismic analysisEngineeringGeologyForensic engineeringMathematicsMechanical engineeringMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Shake table tests of single degree of freedom elastic/inelastic structures have confirmed that by adding a negative stiffness device (NSD), capable of exhibiting nonlinear elastic negative stiffness, in conjunction with a viscous damper, the acceleration, inter‐story drifts, and base shear can be reduced significantly. However, little is known about how the presence of NSD/damper in the first story influences the response of higher stories of a multistory structure. In this paper, shake table test results are presented that demonstrate the advantages of NSD/damper in the first story of a multidegree of freedom, three‐story, fixed‐base structure (MDOF‐3SFS). Results confirm that deployment of NSD/damper at the first story leads to significant reductions of acceleration as well as base shear and inter‐story deformations in the MDOF‐3SFS. Essentially, an NSD and a damper in the first floor prevents the transmission of the input energy from the ground motion to the second and third story of the multistory structure by deflecting and dissipating energy. If the first‐story displacements become excessive, NSD stiffens and prevents collapse. The efficacy of the NSD/damper system is further demonstrated by comparing it with the performance of a structure with passive viscous dampers deployed in the first story. In addition to the reduction of base shear and maximum accelerations, the NSD/damper system also restricts large deformations to the first story only, leading to minimal damage to the whole structure. Finally, an NSD‐based bracing system is introduced that can be deployed in new and existing structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.287
Threshold uncertainty score0.541

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it