Asymmetric right ventricular myocardial work correlates with gold standard measurements of cardiac function in pulmonary hypertension
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Right ventricular (RV) (dys)function determines outcomes in pulmonary hypertension (PH). We previously found that asymmetric RV myocardial work (MW) corresponds with inefficient RV function in experimental PH models. We therefore aimed to investigate regional distribution of RV MW and its correlation with catheter hemodynamics in children with PH. RV MW was calculated by longitudinal strain and simultaneous catheter pressure measurements in 14 patients with PH. Wasted MW was defined as the ratio of inappropriate myocardial lengthening to favorable shortening work. Segment‐wise and averaged MW and wasted MW were evaluated at baseline and during pulmonary vasodilation therapy with oxygen and nitric oxide, and their relationship to hemodynamic measurements was analyzed. We found that MW was higher for the lateral wall than the septum: 1013 ± 374 mmHg · % versus 532 ± 190 mmHg · % at baseline. Wasted MW ratio did not differ significantly between wall regions. Pulmonary vasodilators slightly reduced mean pulmonary artery pressure and was accompanied by a more symmetrical MW distribution. Averaged MW correlated with the rate of RV pressure development (dP/dt maximum) and decay (dP/dt minimum) at all conditions (p 0.047). The results suggest that MW contribute to, and may be used as a marker of, systolic and diastolic efficiency in the PH RV.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".