MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404456223 · doi:10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213507

An effective approach to implement asphaltene precipitation in reservoir simulation

2024· article· en· W4404456223 on OpenAlexaff
Farhana Akter, Syed Imtiaz, Sohrab Zendehboudi, Amer Aborig

Bibliographic record

VenueGeoenergy Science and Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsphaltenePetroleum engineeringPrecipitationReservoir simulationEnvironmental scienceGeologyComputer scienceSoil scienceMeteorologyPaleontologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Asphaltene precipitation and deposition in rock surfaces in oil reservoirs causes formation damage and leads to low well productivity. Therefore, analyzing the asphaltene behavior in terms of precipitation, deposition and its impact on reservoir properties is vital for predicting the production performance of asphaltic oil reservoir. Pure solid model has been widely employed to predict asphaltene precipitation. However, this approach requires a series of flash calculations through a trial-and-error procedure. This leads to higher computational time. Therefore, in this work, a modification in pure solid model is introduced so that asphaltene precipitation can be estimated explicitly in a single-stage flash calculation in each time step, resulting in reduction of computational time. At a sample pressure 2800 psia, asphaltene precipitation calculation has been presented by applying both pure and modified solid model. The comparative results show a difference of around 10% between these two methods. This work also discusses the simulation of wellbore region of production well in an asphaltic oil reservoir that experiences asphaltene precipitation and deposition. An analysis regarding development of asphaltene precipitation and its consequence on reservoir properties (porosity, permeability) and pressure is presented. For simulation, the black oil model of four phases (water-oil-gas-asphaltene) is developed and a detailed description on mathematical model development is presented. The result from the simulation shows that around the wellbore, the asphaltene precipitation is maximum resulting to maximum damage in permeability and porosity. In addition, comparing between “asphaltene precipitation” and “no asphaltene precipitation” cases, a difference of 11.2% in cumulative oil production is observed. • A new modification in solid model for explicit estimation of asphaltene precipitation. • A small difference between estimations by modified model and experimental data. • A faster modified method with less steps. • Solid molar volume of asphaltene with the most impact on asphaltene precipitation. • Total asphaltene content in asphaltene precipitation with the minimal impact.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.167
Threshold uncertainty score0.284

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeoenergy Science and EngineeringSame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207