MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404458457 · doi:10.1080/10589759.2024.2426705

Development of compact smart bearing and novel hybrid feature assessment for weak defect identification

2024· article· en· W4404458457 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueNondestructive Testing And Evaluation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsIdentification (biology)Feature (linguistics)Bearing (navigation)Pattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceMaterials scienceBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, a compact smart bearing with self-sensing and condition monitoring function is proposed. A traditional bearing embedded in a piezoelectric transducer ring with a segmented electrode design is prototyped and tested under different working conditions. Its compact design ensures compatibility for integration with different systems. The segmented electrodes enable possible multidirectional data acquisition and piezoelectric energy generation, suggesting potential integration with Internet of Things (IoT) platforms. Utilizing the high sensitivity, fast response and high signal resolution of the piezoelectric material in conjunction with a novel design that enables close contact between the piezoelectric transducer and the bearing, the smart bearing demonstrates effective performance in detecting weak bearing defects signals. A novel feature characterising method is proposed, and a hybridised feature selection method is employed for reducing the dimension of feature subsets and ensuring defect identification accuracy. A classification model for the identification of defects is developed based on a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network. The performance of the smart bearing and the method for identifying the defects are evaluated through experiments to demonstrate the potential for practical applications. A preliminary experiment for energy harvesting using the smart bearing has been conducted, and it proves the potential to sustain power.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.643
Threshold uncertainty score0.484

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.313 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it