MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404466566 · doi:10.1080/01490400.2024.2428388

The Power of Community: A Leisure-Based Approach to Postvention

2024· article· en· W4404466566 on OpenAlexafffund
Julia Froese, Lisa McDermott

Bibliographic record

VenueLeisure Sciences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicParticipatory Visual Research Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersFaculty of Graduate Studies and Research, University of Alberta
KeywordsPower (physics)PsychologySociologyPsychotherapist

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Losing a loved one to suicide is often traumatizing. Those left behind to bear the loss do so under a shroud of stigma, shame, blame, and regret, alongside other complex emotions. Due to the misconceptions surrounding suicide, individuals closest to the bereft often do not know how to respond to the loss, leaving the survivor to grapple with arguably one of the most challenging events of their life alone. Yet, evidence suggests that suicide survivors may find meaningful group support and ways to integrate the loss into their lives through postvention resources. Drawing inspiration from Pieper’s contemplative leisure, and in collaboration with suicide survivors, we explore leisure’s potential in a co-created suicide bereavement support group. Our findings indicate that leisure as a contemplative act helped facilitate healing within a participatory action research postvention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.024
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.791
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0240.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.596
GPT teacher head0.630
Teacher spread0.034 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLeisure SciencesSame topicParticipatory Visual Research MethodsFrench-language works237,207