Robust Video List Decoding in Error-Prone Transmission Systems Using a Deep Learning Approach
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper introduces a novel deep-learning assisted video list decoding method for error-prone video transmission systems. Unlike traditional list decoding techniques, our proposed system uses a Transformer-based no-reference image quality assessment method to select the highest-scoring reconstructed video candidate after reception. Three new components are defined and used in the Transformer-assisted image quality evaluation metric: neighborhood-based patch fidelity aggregation, discriminant color texture transformation and ranking-constrained penalty loss function. We have also created our own database of non-uniformly distorted images, similar to those that might result from transmission errors, in a High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC) context. In our specific testing context, our improved Transformer-assisted method has a decision accuracy of 100% for intra-coded image, while, for errors occurring in an inter image, it is 96%. Notably, in the few cases where a wrong choice is made, the selected candidate’s quality remains similar to the intact frame. Code: <uri xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">https://github.com/Yujing0926/Robust-Video-List-Decoding-Using-a-Deep-Learning-Approach</uri>.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".