MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404469597 · doi:10.1109/lawp.2024.3501371

Anisotropic Bilayer Transmissive Huygens Metasurface for Generating Multi-OAM Beams With Orthogonal Modes and Polarizations

2024· article· en· W4404469597 on OpenAlexaff
Rasoul Ebrahimzadeh, Larbi Talbi, Mohammad Yousefzadeh, Khelifa Hettak

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOrbital Angular Momentum in Optics
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnisotropyOpticsBilayerPhysicsPolarization (electrochemistry)Materials scienceOptoelectronicsMembraneChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This letter proposes a bilayer transmissive Huygens metasurface with an independent phase response for two orthogonal polarizations to generate two distinct modes of orbital angular momentum (OAM) beams. The performance of the proposed unit cell is comprehensively investigated, and its efficiency in the near field is verified through an analytical approach. Then, the necessary theories for realizing converged OAM beams by merging the lens and OAM phase distributions are inclusively elaborated. Moreover, a dual-polarized quad-ridged open-ended waveguide antenna is designed to illuminate the metasurface. Ultimately, two scenarios are explored through the designed surface. The first strategy generates the second (<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$l_{x}=2$</tex-math></inline-formula>) and third (<inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$l_{y}=3$</tex-math></inline-formula>) modes of the OAM beams in the <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">x</i>- and <italic xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">y</i>-polarizations, respectively, while the second strategy produces modes <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$l_{x}=0$</tex-math></inline-formula> and <inline-formula xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><tex-math notation="LaTeX">$l_{y}=2$</tex-math></inline-formula> in two orthogonal polarizations. It appears that the suggested configuration managed to obtain a respectable level of agreement between simulation and measurement results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score0.566

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation LettersSame topicOrbital Angular Momentum in OpticsFrench-language works237,207