MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404479533 · doi:10.1145/3678698.3687262

Mentorship Navigator: Visual Exploration of Academic Lineages

2024· article· en· W4404479533 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Gonzalo Gabriel Méndez, Oscar Moreno

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEvaluation of Teaching Practices
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Regina
KeywordsMentorshipComputer scienceHuman–computer interactionComputer graphics (images)Visual artsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Visualizing academic lineage is valuable for understanding the transmission of knowledge and the development of disciplines over time.We present Mentorship Navigator, an interactive visualization tool that allows users to explore academic lineages shaped through mentorship.Our tool leverages data from the Math Genealogy Project to examine mentor-mentee relationships dynamically.It also incorporates data from OpenAlex to explore the academic contributions of thesis advisors and their descendants.By supporting interactive and incremental construction of a scholar's genealogy, Mentorship Navigator provides a nuanced view of scholarly trajectories, contributing to a better understanding of their influence on contemporary academic thought.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesBibliometrics
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Software · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.261
GPT teacher head0.539
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreSoftware

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEvaluation of Teaching PracticesFrench-language works237,207