MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404480116 · doi:10.1109/tim.2024.3497061

Energy-Efficient Aerial Data Aggregation for IoT: From Prototyping to Large-Scale Implementation

2024· article· en· W4404480116 on OpenAlexaff
Omar Khalifa, Anas S. Mohammed, Ali Alhejab, Abdelrahman S. Abdelrahman, Ahmed Al-Radhwan, Ruslan Zhagypar, Hesham ElSawy, Nour Kouzayha, Noha Al-Harthi, Jaafar M. H. Elmirghani, Zekeriya Aksoy, Tareq Y. Al-Naffouri

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUAV Applications and Optimization
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScale (ratio)Computer scienceData aggregatorRapid prototypingEnergy (signal processing)Internet of ThingsEmbedded systemEngineeringWireless sensor networkOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The integration of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) within the Internet of Things (IoT) framework has emerged as a compelling solution to address the energy constraints that impede the full realization of IoT potential. As IoT applications continue to proliferate across industries, the dependence on battery-powered devices poses challenges in terms of longevity, maintenance, and sustainability. UAVs have been widely promoted as efficient enablers for aerial data aggregation in IoT networks due to their high capability of approaching hard-to-reach areas. Recently, UAVs have been integrated with the wake-up radio (WuR) technology to further extend the lifetime of IoT networks. In this article, we explore the theoretical foundations, technical intricacies, and practical implications of the integration of UAVs and WuR technology, showcasing its capability to extend network coverage, prolong operational lifespans, and enhance data reliability. More specifically, this work proposes a comprehensive design and implementation of a UAV-enabled WuR and data collection (U-WuRIoT) system, with a focus on achieving extended wake-up range and low power consumption. Based on the obtained measurements, we compare the U-WuRIoT system against the traditional duty-cycling (DCY) scheme. The results highlight the efficiency of U-WuRIoT in overcoming the trade-off between energy consumption and data-collection reliability. Furthermore, we go beyond prototyping to test U-WuRIoT in large-scale deployments by developing a comprehensive analytical framework using stochastic geometry. Drawing insights from both analytical constructs and experimental validation, this work envisions a future where UAV-WuR synergy unleashes the full potential of IoT applications while surmounting the challenges of energy constraints.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.953
Threshold uncertainty score0.636

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and MeasurementSame topicUAV Applications and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207