MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404482893 · doi:10.1063/5.0243150

Pore-scale study on shear rheology of wet granular materials

2024· article· en· W4404482893 on OpenAlexaff
Linlin Fei, Ya‐Ling He, Dominique Derome, Jan Carmeliet

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics of Fluids · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
FundersNational Key Research and Development Program of China
KeywordsPhysicsRheologyShear (geology)Scale (ratio)Shear flowMechanicsComposite materialThermodynamicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study pore-scale rheological phenomena in two-dimensional sheared wet granular materials. Simulations use a coupled cascaded lattice Boltzmann and discrete element method, to model the liquid–gas multiphase flows and multiple-solid-particle dynamics, respectively. The wet granular material is prepared by first filling a rectangular domain with solid particles and then partially filling the pores between the particles with the liquid phase. The material is then sheared based on standard Couette flow configuration, i.e., with lid-driven velocities U and -U on the top and bottom walls, respectively. The simulations show that the apparent viscosity of the system attains a minimum when the material is wet but not fully saturated, i.e., at a saturation of ∼0.10. Such an observation is coherent both for materials composed of monodisperse and polydisperse particles. Interestingly, this observation coincides with the experimental finding of the decrease in sliding friction on sand by adding a small amount of water. The underlying mechanism is elucidated based on the pore-scale study of liquid patch dynamics. It is shown that, with increasing liquid saturation, the rheology of the wet granular materials is affected by two competing effects: (i) a larger number of liquid patches appear leading to fluidization of the system and (ii) larger patches are formed, clogging the flow. The minimum apparent viscosity saturation of ∼0.10 coincides with the maximum of the product of the two factors: the number of liquid patches and ratio between the system height and largest patch height.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.450

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysics of FluidsSame topicLattice Boltzmann Simulation StudiesFrench-language works237,207