MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404483793 · doi:10.4000/12pbl

Le zonage municipal à l’épreuve de la liberté de religion : une analyse en contexte québécois

2024· article· fr· W4404483793 on OpenAlexaffabout
Frédéric Dejean

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue du droit des religions · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le paysage religieux québécois est caractérisé par un fort pluralisme qui se traduit localement par des demandes de groupes religieux pour disposer de lieux de culte. Leur encadrement urbanistique constitue le « zonage religieux » dont la visée n’est pas de régir les croyances, mais d’encadrer les impacts des activités religieuses sur un territoire. Le « zonage religieux » peut être mis en relation avec la liberté de religion à travers la notion de « discrimination ». Parce que le fait d’aménager l’espace urbain repose sur des décisions qui visent la réalisation du bien commun et qui sont susceptibles de ne pas satisfaire certains groupes, se pose alors la question suivante : à quel moment la distinction opérée par le zonage urbain est-elle discriminatoire et problématique, au sens où elle porte atteinte aux droits et libertés des individus ?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.878
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue du droit des religionsSame topicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, GenderFrench-language works237,207