FMCNet: A Fuzzy Multiscale Convolution Network for Remote Sensing Image Segmentation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Due to being affected by factors such as imaging distance, lighting, ground features, and environment, objects in the same class may have certain differences, and different classes of objects often produce similar visual features in remote sensing images. This phenomenon leads to an uncertainty problem in segmentation of remote sensing images, i.e., intra-class heterogeneity and inter-class blurring. To alleviate this problem, a fuzzy multiscale convolution neural network (FMCNet) is proposed in this paper. By extracting receptive fields of different scales, sizes and aspect ratios, the detailed information in remote sensing objects is fully represented. The relationship between their adjacent pixels is effectively expressed by fuzzy logic learning to alleviate the uncertain segmentation. The proposed method achieves overall accuracies of 85.33%, 86.31%, and 85.39% on the Vaihingen, Potsdam, and Gaofen Image datasets respectively. It demonstrates superior performance compared to existing popular methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it