3‐D Subsurface Geophysical Modeling of the Charity Shoal Structure: A Probable Late Proterozoic‐Early Paleozoic Simple Impact Structure in Eastern Lake Ontario
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The Charity Shoal structure is a circular, ∼1.2‐km‐diameter, bedrock‐rimmed shoal in eastern Lake Ontario with a ∼20‐m‐deep central basin. The structure has been proposed as a possible Middle Ordovician impact crater or volcanic intrusion. We conducted marine seismic and magnetic surveys (9‐km 2 ) and 3‐D geophysical modeling to better resolve the Charity Shoal subsurface geology and possible origins. Three models were evaluated: (a) a buried (>450 m) impact structure in Mesoproterozoic basement, (b) a maar‐diatreme, (c) a cylindrical, zoned volcanic plug. Seismic profiles and multi‐beam bathymetry revealed >30 m of Quaternary sediments overlying Middle Ordovician (Trenton Group) carbonate bedrock and complex, 3‐dimensional folding and faulting of the structure rim. Magnetic surveys recorded an annular magnetic high (>600 nT) over the structure rim and a central magnetic low (∼500–600 nT) coincident with a ∼−1.7 mGal Bouguer gravity anomaly. The continuity of Trenton Group strata in seismic profiles rules out a previously proposed Mesozoic maar‐diatreme intruded into Paleozoic strata. The zoned volcanic plug model reproduced the annular magnetic anomaly but was incompatible with Bouguer gravity profiles. The magnetic anomaly was best reproduced by a simple impact structure seated in Mesoproterozoic basement at 450–500 m depth with a rim‐to‐rim diameter of ∼1.2 km and rim height of ∼10–20 m. A 100‐m wide and 50‐m‐deep channel in the Mesoproterozoic basement may record fluvial dissection of the southwestern rim. A buried (>450 m), simple impact crater is most compatible with all available geophysical data at Charity Shoal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".