MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404488682 · doi:10.1155/atr/6496007

<i>B</i><sup>∗</sup> Algorithm: Multiobjective Path Planning for Flexible Buses Traffic System

2024· article· en· W4404488682 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ke Zhang, Rong-Guei Tsai, Chengtao Xu, Yicong Yu, Zhiming Huang, Xiaolan Chen, Lin Lin, Delin Luo, Shanna He

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advanced Transportation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDepartment of Education, Fujian ProvincePutian Science and Technology BureauNatural Science Foundation of Fujian Province
KeywordsPath (computing)AlgorithmComputer scienceMotion planningTransport engineeringMathematical optimizationEngineeringMathematicsArtificial intelligenceComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Advances in vehicle intelligence have ushered in the rapid development of intelligent connected vehicles and the emergence of the Internet of Vehicles (IoV), greatly improving the passenger travel experience. However, as a new mode of transport, flexible public transportation presents challenges for operators in terms of reducing costs and improving passenger experiences through complex route planning. The present study introduces B ∗ as a heuristic multiobjective route planning algorithm that addresses these challenges. Using the trajectory extraction procedure (TEP) and route assignment procedure (RAP), B ∗ filters out inaccessible routes and plans efficient routes on the fly to save money and enhance the passenger experience. Experimental results show that B ∗ outperforms traditional methods in terms of shorter driving distances and reduced passenger waiting times, highlighting its potential to optimize bus utilization and improve travel experiences.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.303
Threshold uncertainty score0.805

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advanced TransportationSame topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207