Reorganized brain functional network topology in stable and progressive mild cognitive impairment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) includes two distinct subtypes, namely progressive MCI (pMCI) and stable MCI (sMCI). The objective of this study was to identify the topological reorganization of brain functional networks in patients with pMCI and sMCI. Methods: Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) was applied to patients with pMCI, sMCI and healthy controls. Graph theory was applied to study the topological characteristics of the brain's functional networks, examining global and nodal metrics, modularity, and rich-club organization. Analysis of covariance and two sample t-tests were applied to assess differences in topological attributes between patient groups, alongside correlation analysis, which examined the value of changing topological attributes in predicting various clinical outcomes. Results: Significant differences between each group with regard to network metrics were observed. These included clustering coefficients and small-worldness. At the nodal level, several nodes with an abnormal degree centrality and nodal efficiency were detected. In rich club, pMCI and sMCI patients showed declined connectivity compared with HC. Significant differences were observed in the intra- and inter-module connections among the three groups. Particularly noteworthy was the irreplaceable role of the cerebellar module in network interactions. Conclusion: Our study revealed significant differences in network topological properties among sMCI, pMCI and HC patients, which were significantly correlated with cognitive function. Most notably, the cerebellar module played a crucial role in the overall network interactions. In conclusion, these findings could aid in the development of imaging markers used to expedite diagnosis and intervention prior to Alzheimer's disease onset.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".