Coupled Electro-Thermal-Aging Battery Pack Modeling—Part 1: Cell Level
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a modeling approach to capture the coupled effects of electrical–thermal aging in Li-ion batteries at the cell level. The proposed semi-empirical method allows for a relatively high accuracy and low computational cost compared to expensive computer simulations. This is something current models often lack but is essential for system level simulations, relevant for electric vehicle manufacturers. The aging analysis includes both cycling and calendar effects across the lifetime of the cell and reversible and irreversible heat in a lumped-mass model to capture the temperature evolution of the cell in operation. The Thévenin equivalent circuit model with capacitance used to simulate the electrical behavior of the cell was experimentally validated, showing a high correlation with the proposed model during the charging and discharging phases. A maximum error of 3% on the voltage reading was identified during discharge with the complete model. This model was also designed to be used as a stepping stone for a comprehensive model at the module and vehicle levels that can later be used by designers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".