MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404503318 · doi:10.1016/j.ijepes.2024.110373

An adaptive voltage reference based multi-objective line flow control methods for MMC-MTDC system

2024· article· en· W4404503318 on OpenAlexaff
Yuanshi Zhang, Wenyan Qian, Yiwen Feng, Fei Zhang, Chenyi Zheng, Qinran Hu, Liwei Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus
FundersJiangsu Key Laboratory of Smart Grid Technology and EquipmentNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Computer scienceLine (geometry)Control engineeringControl (management)EngineeringArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• An advanced methodology is developed for DC line power flow regulation without extra power flow controllers. • A pre-evaluation method is proposed to evaluate the power transfer and available control variables. • A novel control strategy is proposed to develop dispatch solutions for the MTDC system connected to AC girds and wind farms. The regulation of DC line power flow and optimization of system operational characteristics after contingency is crucial for the stable and economic operation of the MTDC grid. In this paper, a novel adaptive voltage reference based multi-objective optimal control method is proposed for proper line power flow control, as well as voltage deviation minimization and economic operation of the MTDC system. A hierarchical control method based on the M-MOMPA algorithm is proposed for the development of dispatch solutions for the MTDC system connected to multiple AC systems and large-scale wind farms. A pre-evaluation method is proposed to choose appropriate control variables and accelerate the convergence of optimization algorithms. The effectiveness of the proposed approach is validated through comparisons with several algorithms. The dynamic simulations of a five-terminal MTDC grid are carried out using MATLAB/Simulink and RTLAB to verify the effectiveness of the proposed method under various types of disturbance and contingency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.937

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Electrical Power & Energy SystemsSame topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207