MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4404504937 · doi:10.7759/cureus.73974

Frequency of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients Admitted With Acute Stroke at Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar

2024· article· en· W4404504937 on OpenAlexaff
Imran Khan, Mehwash Ifthikhar, Ameer Hamza, Ayesha Jamal, Muhammad Numan Saleem

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsSt. Boniface Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAcute kidney injuryStroke (engine)CreatinineLogistic regressionTertiary careKidney diseaseAcute strokeInternal medicineEmergency medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Patients hospitalized with acute stroke are at risk of developing acute kidney injury (AKI), and when both conditions occur together, patient outcomes are often worse. The relationship between stroke type, patient characteristics, and the development of AKI is not fully understood, particularly in tertiary care settings in Pakistan, where healthcare resources and patient characteristics may differ from Western populations. Objective To determine the frequency of AKI and identify associated risk factors, including stroke type, severity, and comorbidities, in patients presenting with acute stroke at a tertiary care center in Pakistan, the Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted at Hayatabad Medical Complex, Peshawar, from February to July 2023. A total of 214 patients with acute stroke were enrolled through non-probability consecutive sampling. AKI was defined using Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria as an increase in serum creatinine by ≥0.3 mg/dL within 48 hours or ≥1.5 times baseline within seven days. Chi-square tests and multivariate logistic regression were used for statistical analysis using IBM SPSS Statistics, Version 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Results Among 214 stroke patients (mean age 53.08±7.52 years, 59.8% male), AKI occurred in 33 patients (15.4%, 95% CI: 10.8-20.9). Ischemic strokes (n=147, 68.7%) showed lower AKI prevalence compared to hemorrhagic strokes (10.2% vs 26.9%, p<0.005). AKI occurred in all severe stroke cases (26/26, 100%) but none in mild (0/12) or moderate (0/149) cases (p<0.001). Comorbidity distribution showed isolated hypertension in 9.3%, diabetes in 38.3%, and both conditions in 52.3% of patients. Mean baseline creatinine was 0.98±0.24 mg/dL, with peak levels of 1.42±0.38 mg/dL in the AKI group. Conclusions In our tertiary care setting, AKI occurred in 15.4% of acute stroke patients, with significantly higher rates of hemorrhagic strokes and severe cases. While hypertension and diabetes were common comorbidities, stroke type and severity were stronger predictors of AKI development. These findings suggest the need for targeted monitoring strategies, particularly in patients with hemorrhagic or severe strokes, to facilitate early detection and management of AKI in acute stroke settings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureus→Same topicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management→French-language works237,207→