Contemporary Lusheng as an Educational Resource in Teaching Chinese Folk Music
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The contemporary Lusheng, a reed instrument from the Miao ethnic group in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China, has significantly transformed since the 1970s to expand its musical capabilities and adaptability in modern educational settings. This study explores the role of the contemporary Lusheng as an educational resource in teaching Chinese folk music. Conducted in Nanning City and Rongshui Miao Autonomous County, the research involves ethnographic fieldwork, interviews with three key informants, performers, educators, and instrument makers, and observations of educational practices. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis, focusing on how contemporary Lusheng is integrated into music education and its impact on cultural preservation and student engagement. The findings reveal that the contemporary Lusheng, with its expanded pitch range and improved design, is an effective tool for teaching Chinese folk music's technical and cultural aspects. It enhances student engagement and fosters a deeper appreciation for traditional music. However, challenges remain in integrating the instrument into urban education settings and addressing gaps in teacher training. The study suggests further developing specialized teacher training programs and exploring digital media to promote Lusheng in diverse educational contexts.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".