Management of Tricuspid Atresia With Normally Related Great Arteries and Left-Sided Obstruction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BackgroundTricuspid atresia (TA) is the second most common form of functionally univentricular heart. For patients with TA and normally related great arteries (Type I), left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) is rare.MethodsFrom the Congenital Heart Surgeons' Society multi-institutional cohort of 445 patients with Type I TA enrolled from 1999 to 2024 from 42 sites, 14 infants (3%) had interventions for associated LVOTO, either at presentation or after their first TA-related intervention.ResultsOf seven infants initially undergoing Norwood/Damus-Kaye-Stansel (DKS), six survived to Stage II, of whom five survived with one developing pulmonary hypertension and four achieving Fontan. An additional seven infants who were first managed with pulmonary artery band placement subsequently had bidirectional superior cavopulmonary anastomosis (BCPA) and a DKS procedure; there were six survivors, all achieving Fontan. All ten survivors who underwent the Fontan procedure had normal left ventricular and mitral valve function at the latest follow-up. The overall Kaplan-Meier survival estimate at 20 years for these 14 patients was 79% (70% CI, 66%-88%), and the median follow-up was 8.3 years (0.24-21.5).ConclusionsWhile infants with TA and transposition of the great arteries are more likely to have LVOTO, this can also occur in the setting of normally related great arteries. Infants with Type I TA and LVOTO can be managed in the neonatal period with the Norwood procedure ensuring complete arch relief with acceptable outcomes. If LVOTO becomes evident after initial pulmonary artery band placement, a subsequent DKS procedure facilitates satisfactory success to Fontan.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".