MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404507466 · doi:10.1177/00225266241295310

Exclusion through integration: Roadbuilding and colonización in Colombia's Eastern territories

2024· article· en· W4404507466 on OpenAlex
Zannah Matson

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Transport History · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistory and Politics in Latin America
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsHistoryPolitical scienceGeographyAncient historyEconomic geographyArchaeologyEconomyEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The most recent Colombian civil conflict is widely understood to have its roots in longstanding land conflict that arose from unequal land distribution in the country. In a purported effort to pacify leftist peasant demands for land without angering landholding elites through meaningful land redistribution, starting in the 1950s the Colombian state intensified colonización programmes to settle the eastern territories. This article examines the entanglements of road construction and land politics during this period of colonización, considering the systematic establishment of penetration, transversal and local roads as technologies of land control. Analysing planning documents for one of the most significant highway projects from the period – the Marginal de la Selva – alongside influential research on land colonización, this article argues that the Marginal de la Selva extended patterns of uneven integration and exacerbated exclusion of Indigenous people from their land.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it