MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404511201 · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-9454q

Catalytic Photothermal Hydrogenation of Carbon Dioxide to Liquid Fuels using Pt/GaN prepared via SOMC

2024· preprint· en· W4404511201 on OpenAlexafffund
Hyotaik Kang, Enzo Brack, Domenico Gioffrè, Alexander V. Yakimov, Christophe Copéret, Chao‐Jun Li

Bibliographic record

VenueChemRxiv · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicAdvanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNCCR CatalysisCanada Foundation for InnovationNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsPhotothermal therapyCatalysisCarbon dioxideMaterials scienceCarbon fibersChemical engineeringNanotechnologyOrganic chemistryChemistryComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Renewable liquid fuels are expected to play a crucial role in transitioning to a more sustainable future. Their synthesis via the hydrogenation of CO2 using solar energy emerges as a promising technology, that combines both the use of a renewable primary energy source and the (re)utilization of a major greenhouse gas. In this context, GaN has attracted a lot of attention in harnessing solar energy to drive chemical transformations. In this work we study GaN by 1H solid-state NMR spectroscopy, revealing the presence of terminal Ga-OH, bridging Ga–NH–Ga as well as Ga–OH–Ga surface functional groups and combinations thereof. With this knowledge in hand, we make use of surface organometallic chemistry (SOMC) to prepare a Pt/GaN catalyst with highly dispersed Pt nanoparticles on GaN. Under photothermal conditions using visible light (>320 nm), the synthesized Pt/GaN promotes the hydrogenation of CO2 to C2+ products such as acetone, EtOH, iPrOH, and acetic acid in a batch reactor at 60 °C and 1 bar of pressure, while the pristine GaN counterpart only produces minor amounts of MeOH and acetone. Furthermore, a recycling test was performed to showcase the stability of the catalyst over multiple batch reaction cycles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemRxivSame topicAdvanced Photocatalysis TechniquesFrench-language works237,207