MatrixDB 2024: an increased coverage of extracellular matrix interactions, a new Network Explorer and a new web interface
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MatrixDB, a member of the International Molecular Exchange consortium (IMEx), is a curated interaction database focused on interactions established by extracellular matrix (ECM) constituents including proteins, proteoglycans, glycosaminoglycans and ECM bioactive fragments. The architecture of MatrixDB was upgraded to ease interaction data export, allow versioning and programmatic access and ensure sustainability. The new version of the database includes more than twice the number of manually curated and experimentally-supported interactions. High-confidence predicted interactions were imported from the Integrated Interactions Database to increase the coverage of the ECM interactome. ECM and ECM-associated proteins of five species (human, murine, bovine, avian and zebrafish) were annotated with matrisome divisions and categories, which are used for computational analyses of ECM -omic datasets. Biological pathways from the Reactome Pathway Knowledgebase were also added to the biomolecule description. New transcriptomic and expanded proteomic datasets were imported in MatrixDB to generate cell- and tissue-specific ECM networks using the newly developed in-house Network Explorer integrated in the database. MatrixDB is freely available at https://matrixdb.univ-lyon1.fr.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.034 | 0.016 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".