Multi-mineral geochronology reveals a protracted Mesoproterozoic tectonic and metallogenic link between southeastern Australia and Laurentia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plate tectonic reconstructions place Laurentia and eastern Australia together during the Mesoproterozoic. Specifically, the Belt-Purcell Basin in the USA and Canada has been linked to the Rocky Cape Group in northwest Tasmania based on detrital zircon studies. The Belt-Purcell Basin is highly endowed in economic deposits of Cu, Pb, Zn, Ag and critical metals such as Co, formed during the Mesoproterozoic. The Rocky Cape Group of northwest Tasmania hosts several sediment-hosted Cu-Pb-Zn ± Co prospects, however they were previously thought to be Devonian in age. New laser ablation inductively-couple plasma mass spectroscopy (LA-ICP-MS) in situ U-Pb monazite, xenotime and apatite data, sensitive high resolution ion microprobe (SHRIMP) in-situ U-Pb monazite data, and LA-ICP-MS galena Pb isotope data were collected from these prospects. By using multiple minerals with different U–Pb closure temperatures, we have unravelled a complex and protracted history of thermal pulses in the Rocky Cape region associated with Cu-Pb-Zn ± Co mineralisation. These data indicate that primary sulphide mineralisation formed at c. 1350 Ma, with several resetting or remobilisation events recorded at c. 1250 Ma, c. 1100 Ma and c. 950 Ma. These ages are contemporaneous with previously published authigenic monazite and metamorphic monazite ages from the Rocky Cape Group. This suggests that mineralisation is broadly syn -sedimentary and related to the development of the basin into which the Rocky Cape Group was deposited. These new ages are similar to those of sediment-hosted ore deposits in the Belt-Purcell Basin in the USA and Canada, further supporting the proposed link between northwest Tasmania and North America during the Mesoproterozoic. The high metal endowment of age-equivalent rocks in the Belt-Purcell Basin, highlight the potential for new discoveries of base and critical metals in southeastern Australia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".