MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Multi-mineral geochronology reveals a protracted Mesoproterozoic tectonic and metallogenic link between southeastern Australia and Laurentia

2024· article· en· W4404512680 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sheree Armistead, Sébastien Meffre, R. S. Bottrill, Andrew Cross, David Huston, Grace Cumming

Bibliographic record

VenuePrecambrian Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersPredictive Mineral Discovery Cooperative Research Centre
KeywordsLaurentiaGeochronologyGeologyGeochemistryTectonicsRodiniaMineralPaleontologyCraton

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Plate tectonic reconstructions place Laurentia and eastern Australia together during the Mesoproterozoic. Specifically, the Belt-Purcell Basin in the USA and Canada has been linked to the Rocky Cape Group in northwest Tasmania based on detrital zircon studies. The Belt-Purcell Basin is highly endowed in economic deposits of Cu, Pb, Zn, Ag and critical metals such as Co, formed during the Mesoproterozoic. The Rocky Cape Group of northwest Tasmania hosts several sediment-hosted Cu-Pb-Zn ± Co prospects, however they were previously thought to be Devonian in age. New laser ablation inductively-couple plasma mass spectroscopy (LA-ICP-MS) in situ U-Pb monazite, xenotime and apatite data, sensitive high resolution ion microprobe (SHRIMP) in-situ U-Pb monazite data, and LA-ICP-MS galena Pb isotope data were collected from these prospects. By using multiple minerals with different U–Pb closure temperatures, we have unravelled a complex and protracted history of thermal pulses in the Rocky Cape region associated with Cu-Pb-Zn ± Co mineralisation. These data indicate that primary sulphide mineralisation formed at c. 1350 Ma, with several resetting or remobilisation events recorded at c. 1250 Ma, c. 1100 Ma and c. 950 Ma. These ages are contemporaneous with previously published authigenic monazite and metamorphic monazite ages from the Rocky Cape Group. This suggests that mineralisation is broadly syn -sedimentary and related to the development of the basin into which the Rocky Cape Group was deposited. These new ages are similar to those of sediment-hosted ore deposits in the Belt-Purcell Basin in the USA and Canada, further supporting the proposed link between northwest Tasmania and North America during the Mesoproterozoic. The high metal endowment of age-equivalent rocks in the Belt-Purcell Basin, highlight the potential for new discoveries of base and critical metals in southeastern Australia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.138

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.337
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePrecambrian ResearchSame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207