MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404514926 · doi:10.1016/j.prime.2024.100844

Piecewise affine modeling of parallel boost converter in a DC microgrid and its control application by utilizing a Linear Matrix Inequality approach

2024· article· en· W4404514926 on OpenAlexaff
Wakhyu Dwiono, Bambang Riyanto Trilaksono, Tri Desmana Rachmildha, Arwindra Rizqiawan

Bibliographic record

Venuee-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering Electronics and Energy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrogrid Control and Optimization
Canadian institutionsArtificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)
FundersKementerian Keuangan Republik Indonesia
KeywordsAffine transformationMathematicsApplied mathematicsMicrogridBoost converterControl theory (sociology)Matrix (chemical analysis)Piecewise linear functionMathematical optimizationComputer scienceControl (management)Mathematical analysisPure mathematicsPower (physics)PhysicsArtificial intelligenceMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Piecewise Affine (PWA) model approximates nonlinear systems using linear models within specific regions. This approach offers advantages for designing DC microgrid control systems with linear controllers, mainly when the system includes several nonlinear DC–DC boost converters. The boundaries of the PWA model can be established using straightforward methods based on duty cycle partitions. Each duty-cycle region represents a distinct operational mode of the system characterized by unique dynamic equations. This study presents a formulation for deriving the PWA model of a parallel boost converter based on its nonlinear average dynamics resulting from the multiplication of states and inputs. An average dynamics model for the parallel boost converter is also introduced and employed in the deriving formulation. Moreover, computer simulations were conducted to analyze the PWA models of parallel boost converter dynamics, employing various partitions, comparing their behaviors among themselves and against those of the Matlab Simulink model. Furthermore, laboratory experiments were conducted by implementing a controller based on Linear Matrix Inequalities (LMI), designed using the PWA model of the parallel boost converter, to regulate the converter’s output voltage. The simulation and experimental results demonstrate that the PWA models of parallel boost converter dynamics closely align with those of the average model, making it well-suited for being controlled using a linear controller. • The mathematical model of a parallel boost converter has been studied. • The average dynamics model of the parallel boost converter has been formulated. • The PWA model of the parallel boost converter has been formulated. • The dynamic behavior of the PWA model has been analyzed through computer simulation. • An example was presented through simulation and experimental validation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuee-Prime - Advances in Electrical Engineering Electronics and EnergySame topicMicrogrid Control and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207