MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Time Trends in Preeclampsia and Gestational Diabetes in Denmark and Alberta, Canada, 2005 to 2018: A Population-Based Cohort Study

2024· article· en· W4404518210 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Frederikke Lihme, A. Savu, Saima Basit, Winnie Sia, Roseanne O. Yeung, O. Barrett, Laila Luoma, Deliwe P. Ngwezi, S. Davidge, Colleen M. Norris, Maria B. Ospina, Christy‐Lynn M. Cooke, Russell Greiner, Jan Wohlfahrt, Mads Melbye, Jacob Alexander Lykke, P. Kaul, H.A. Boyd

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetric Anesthesia Digest · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineGestational diabetesPreeclampsiaObstetricsCohortPopulationDemographyPregnancyGestationEnvironmental healthInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

( Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2024;103:266–275. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14703) Preeclampsia (PEC) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) have similar risk factors including increased maternal age and obesity. Both conditions are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes and long-term health issues for mothers and children, and health care resources could be strained if the prevalence of PEC and GMA are increasing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.291
Threshold uncertainty score0.878

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetric Anesthesia DigestSame topicPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesFrench-language works237,207