MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404518767 · doi:10.1186/s13063-024-08634-4

A phase 1 randomized controlled trial of a peptide-based group A streptococcal vaccine in healthy volunteers

2024· article· en· W4404518767 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Vanessa Meier‐Stephenson, Michael Hawkes, Catherine Burton, Ainslie Calcutt, Chris Davis, Jessica Dooley, Michael F. Good, Michael Houghton, Eloise C. Keeffe, Kelly Kim, Ailin Lepletier, Conar O’Neil, Ijeoma Ogbuehi, Victoria Ozberk, Manisha Pandey, Simone Reynolds, William Stokes, Alena Tse‐Chang, B. Tyrrell, D. Lorne Tyrrell, Gregory J. Tyrrell, Maryna Yaskina

Bibliographic record

VenueTrials · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStreptococcal Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNational Health and Medical Research CouncilMedical Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchFondation pour la Recherche MédicaleUniversity of AlbertaNational Foundation for Medical Research and Innovation
KeywordsMedicinePharyngitisStreptococcus pyogenesRandomized controlled trialInternal medicineToxic shock syndromeClinical trialFasciitisStreptococcusDiseaseImmunologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Group A streptococci (Strep A) orStreptococcus pyogenes is a major human pathogen causing an estimated 500,000 deaths worldwide each year. Disease can range from mild pharyngitis to more severe infections, such as necrotizing fasciitis, septicemia, and toxic shock syndrome. Untreated, Strep A infection can lead to the serious post streptococcal pathologies of rheumatic fever/rheumatic heart disease and post-streptococcal glomerulonephritis. An effective vaccine against Strep A would have great benefits worldwide. Here, we test two products, J8 and p*17—both peptide derivatives of a highly conserved region in the M protein, in combination with the protein subunit K4S2 of SpyCEP, an IL-8 protease associated with neutrophil chemoattraction. Each peptide is individually conjugated to cross reacting material (CRM197), and the conjugated peptide vaccines are abbreviated as J8-K4S2 or p*17-K4S2. This single-site phase I, two-stage clinical trial in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, aims to recruit a total of 30 healthy volunteers, aged 18–45 years, without any evidence of pre-existing valvular heart disease. The trial is divided into the initial unblinded safety test dose stage (stage 1) and the randomized, double-blinded, controlled trial stage (stage 2). Stage 1 will recruit 10 volunteers—5 each to receive either J8-K4S2 or p*17-K4S2 in an unblinded, staggered fashion, whereby volunteers are dosed with intentional spacing of at least 2 days in between doses to monitor for any immediate side effects before dosing the next. Once all 5 volunteers have received 3 doses of the first test vaccine, a similar process will follow for the second test vaccine. Once safety is established in stage 1, we will proceed to stage 2, which will recruit 20 volunteers to our 3-arm randomized controlled trial (RCT), receiving either of the trial vaccines, J8-K4S2 or p*17-K4S2, or comparator (rabies) vaccine. All product dosing will be at 0, 3, and 6 weeks. The primary outcome is vaccine safety; the secondary outcome is immunogenicity and comparative analyses of the different vaccine regimens. This Strep A vaccine clinical trial aims to investigate safety and immunogenicity of two novel conjugated peptide-based vaccines, J8-KS42 and p*17-K4S2. If one or both vaccine products demonstrate favorable primary and secondary outcomes, the product(s) will move into phase II and III studies. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04882514. Registered on 2021–05-12, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04882514 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0040.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.062
GPT teacher head0.419
Teacher spread0.357 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrialsSame topicStreptococcal Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207