A Practical Approach to FMCW Radar Deconvolution in the Sea Ice Domain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents a practical step-by-step approach to Frequency Modulated Continuous Wave (FMCW) radar nonlinearity correction (deconvolution), utilizing surface-based Ku- and Ka-band radar data collected over nilas ice within a newly-opened sea ice lead during the 2019/2020 MOSAiC expedition. Two performance metrics are introduced to evaluate deconvolution effectiveness: the spurious free dynamic range (SFDR), which quantifies sidelobe suppression, and the leading edge width (LEW), which quantifies the improvement in surface return clarity. The impact of deconvolution waveforms on different survey dates, radar polarizations, and surface types is examined using echograms and quantitative metrics. Deconvolution results in a maximum SFDR increase of 28 dB, with a maximum 3 dB decline in deconvolution performance observed over an 8-day period and a maximum decline of 15 dB observed over a 71-day period. The LEW values indicate that the effectiveness of deconvolution in enhancing interface clarity depends on the combination of pre-deconvolution sidelobe shape, prominence of the surface return, the influence of snowpack returns, as well as a time-dependent reduction in deconvolution performance. Deconvolution significantly improves surface return clarity for cross-polarized radar data, where weak surface returns are obscured by returns from within the snowpack. The results demonstrate that deconvolution performance is most effective shortly after deconvolution waveform characterization. Therefore, it is recommended to perform at least weekly calibrations using a large metal sheet and ideally calibration before/after data collection to ensure optimal deconvolution performance and effective sidelobe suppression.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".