MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404527368 · doi:10.1080/20555563.2024.2426940

Parsing Fluted Point Technological Variability in the South-Central Ice-Free Corridor

2024· article· en· W4404527368 on OpenAlexafffundabout
John W. Ives, Courtney Lakevold, D L Fisher, Amandah Van Merlin

Bibliographic record

VenuePaleoAmerica · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Canadian institutionsRoyal Alberta MuseumUniversity of Alberta
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
KeywordsParsingPoint (geometry)GeologyPhysical geographyGeographyGeodesyComputer scienceGeometryArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Southern portions of the Ice-Free Corridor likely became habitable not long after 14,000 cal yr BP, available to both stemmed and fluted projectile point makers. There has been little exploration of the technological pathways through which Corridor fluted points were manufactured and maintained, nor has much thought been devoted to fluted point findspots and their implications for discarded fluted point forms. Recent findings from the Brazeau Reservoir in west central Alberta encouraged more detailed investigation of both factors. End-struck, early stage bifacial preforms and fluted late stage bifacial preforms were employed in some Corridor instances. Fluted point life histories have a determinative affect upon tool form but often leave basal morphologies isomorphic with classic Clovis forms such as those from the Naco mammoth kill. Parsing of these technological processes will help chart northward movement of the fluting concept in the Corridor toward its final, Younger Dryas expression in eastern Beringia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.160

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaleoAmericaSame topicArctic and Russian Policy StudiesFrench-language works237,207