MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404527935 · doi:10.1017/s0022046924001428

Romaniser la foi chrétienne? La poésie latine de l'antiquité tardive entre tradition classique et inspiration chrétienne. Edited by Giampiero Scafoglio and Fabrice Wendling. (Collection d'études médiévales de Nice, 20, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. Cultures et Environnements. Préhistoire, Antiquité, Moyen Âge.) Pp. 255. Turnhout: Brepols, 2022. €60 (paper). 978 2 503 60087 1; 2294 852X - Césaire D'Arles. Commentaire de l'apocalypse de Jean. By Roger Gryson. (Sources Chrétiennes, 636.) Pp. 311. Paris: Les Éditions du Cerf, 2023. €59 (paper). 978 2 204 15489 5; 0750 1978

2024· article· fr· W4404527935 on OpenAlexaff
Mark Vessey

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Ecclesiastical History · 2024
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical, Literary, and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.599
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Ecclesiastical HistorySame topicHistorical, Literary, and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207