Le principe du maintien du lien de l’enfant avec ses parents à l’épreuve de la pandémie de COVID-19 au Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les situations inusitées et inattendues ayant résulté de la gestion de la pandémie de COVID-19 par les États et autres juridictions, notamment la fermeture des écoles et le confinement, ont touché les enfants à tous les niveaux de leur vie quotidienne. La problématique des enfants qui se sont trouvés séparés de l’un ou de leurs deux parents durant cette crise appelle une réflexion approfondie afin de déterminer comment il est possible de garantir le maintien des liens parentaux alors que l’instauration de mesures restreignant les déplacements a eu pour effet de compromettre la mise en pratique de ce principe pourtant préconisé par la Convention internationale des droits de l’enfant (CIDE) dans son article 9, sauf lorsque l’intérêt supérieur de l’enfant le justifie. Après avoir examiné l’importance de ces principes tels qu’explicités dans la CIDE, nous analysons leur application durant la pandémie de COVID-19 au Canada, au Nouveau-Brunswick en particulier.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.014 | 0.017 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".