A Case Study of Combined Korean Medicine in Treating a Patient with Vascular Dementia after Traumatic Intracerebral Hemorrhage Accompanying Diabetes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective: This study investigated Korean medicine in treating a case of cognition impairment after stroke with diabetes.Methods: A patient was treated with acupuncture, electroacupuncture, moxibustion, and herbal medicine (Yukmijihwang-tang (Liuweidihuang-wan)) for 69 days. Rehabilitation and speech therapy were also provided.Results: The degree of improvement in symptoms was evaluated using the Korea mini-mental state examination (K-MMSE), the Korean version of the modified Barthel index (K-MBI), the functional independence measure (FIM), the manual muscle test (MMT), HbA1c, average fasting blood sugar, glycated hemoglobin level (HbA1c), and changes in insulin usage. After 66 days of treatment, the MMSE-K increased from 8 to 18, the K-MBI score increased from 13 to 69, and the FIM score increased from 30 to 62. The MMT score increased from left upper extremity Gr.2+P and left lower extremity Gr.2P to left upper extremity Gr.3+F and left lower extremity Gr.3+F. HbA1c changed from 7.1% to 6.5%.Conclusion: This case report suggests that Korean medicine therapy can be effective in improving cognition following traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage and diabetes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".