MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404555012 · doi:10.1016/j.agee.2024.109379

Effluent properties and gas emissions from a conventional wintering area and an alternative stand-off pad providing outdoor exercise to dairy cows

2024· article· en· W4404555012 on OpenAlexaffabout
Elizabeth Álvarez-Chávez, Alexis Ruíz-González, Stéphane Godbout, Mylène Généreux, Caroline Côté, Alain N. Rousseau, Sébastien Fournel

Bibliographic record

VenueAgriculture Ecosystems & Environment · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicConstructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueInstitut de Recherche et de Développement en AgroenvironnementUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEffluentEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Stand-off pads are uncovered outdoor yards built with absorbent materials, where cattle can be raised to minimize the environmental impact associated with nutrient runoff and gas emissions from manure management. Consequently, they emerge as a prospective alternative to traditional wintering pens, facilitating movement opportunities for dairy cows typically confined to tie-stalls. The objective of this study was to validate the potential of an improved stand-off pad concept (with sphagnum peat moss, woodchips and biochar) aerated with the exhaust air from the adjacent barn, in contrast to a conventional wintering pen, to provide outdoor exercise to dairy cows housed year-round in tie-stall barns Quebec, Canada. Both outdoor yards (28 m 2 ) housed one Holstein dairy cow during 1.5 hr, twice daily (morning and afternoon), throughout two 9-week periods (summer and winter). Sampling of effluents and measurement of greenhouse gases from each area were performed on a weekly basis over the course of the study period for both seasons. Results showed that the stand-off pad was more efficient in removing biochemical oxygen demand, chemical oxygen demand, total nitrogen, suspended solids, and E. coli (32.9, 194.2, 19.8, and 24.3 mg L −1 , and 2.2 CFU (100 mL) −1 , respectively), relative to the wintering pen (95.3, 379.5, 54.2, and 43 mg L −1 , and 197 CFU (100 mL) −1 , respectively). Additionally, relative to the wintering pen, the stand-off pad media filter achieved a greater absorption capacity (water effluent volumes of 18.8 m³ and 25.3 m³ respectively). Aeration did not improve the removal of contaminants but resulted in lower nitrous oxide emissions compared to the wintering pen. A nitrogen balance was also calculated, obtaining 62 % recovery for Stand-off pen and 45 % for the winter pen. Improved stand-off pads can indeed provide a more sustainable and comfortable environment for dairy cows. By reducing mud and manure buildup, these pads help maintain cleaner and healthier conditions, which is beneficial for both the cows and the environment. • Stand-off pads offer year-round outdoor access for tie-stall dairy cows. • A mix of sphagnum peat moss, woodchips and biochar is effective in removing contaminants. • Aeration did not improve manure filtration in the stand-off pad during winter. • The stand-off pad was not effective in reducing ammonia emissions. • Nitrogen recovery was greater within the filter media used for the stand-off pad than for the wintering pen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.464
Threshold uncertainty score0.952

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAgriculture Ecosystems & EnvironmentSame topicConstructed Wetlands for Wastewater TreatmentFrench-language works237,207