MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404556535 · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(24)02315-8

Balloon guide catheters for endovascular thrombectomy in patients with acute ischaemic stroke due to large-vessel occlusion in China (PROTECT-MT): a multicentre, open-label, blinded-endpoint, randomised controlled trial

2024· article· en· W4404556535 on OpenAlexaff
Jianmin Liu, Yu Zhou, Lei Zhang, Zifu Li, Wenhuo Chen, Yueqi Zhu, Xiaoxi Yao, Liyong Zhang, Shen Liu, Ya Peng, Ming Wei, Quanbin Zhang, Hansheng Shu, Shouchun Wang, Wenhua Liu, Shu Wan, Tong Li, Yibin Fang, Hongxing Han, Guang Zhang, Lian Huang, Feng Wang, Guangsen Cheng, Lianbo Gao, Hongchao Shi, Jintao Han, Yun Luo, Shuai Li, Chuwei Cai, Rong Yin, Zhenglong Jin, Chengwei Shao, Bing Tian, Yongxin Zhang, Qiang Li, Yingying Zhang, Ping Zhang, Binben Li, Pengfei Xing, Hongjian Shen, Xuan Zhu, Xiaoxi Zhang, Weilong Hua, Fang Shen, Meihua Huyan, Rundong Chen, Qiao Zuo, Qinghai Huang, Yi Xu, Benqiang Deng, Rui Zhao, Mayank Goyal, Yong‐Wei Zhang, Pengfei Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Lancet · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAcute Ischemic Stroke Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersShanghai Hospital Development CenterNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMedicineIschaemic strokeStroke (engine)Clinical endpointOcclusionRandomized controlled trialBalloonThrombolysisPilot trialSurgeryOpen labelEndovascular treatmentInternal medicineIschemiaMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.003
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueThe LancetSame topicAcute Ischemic Stroke ManagementFrench-language works237,207