MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Optimizing Interior PMSMs for Energy Efficiency: Simple Dynamic Direct Voltage Control for Electric Vehicle during Standard Driving Cycles

2024· article· en· W4404563494 on OpenAlexaff
Mohamad Alzayed, Hicham Chaoui

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectric vehicleVoltageSimple (philosophy)Automotive engineeringControl theory (sociology)Energy (signal processing)Computer scienceControl (management)EngineeringElectrical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This manuscript details a strategy focused on evaluating the energy efficiency of various electric vehicle driving cycles, utilizing a simple dynamic direct voltage MTPA speed control (S-DDVC) technique for IPMSMs. By identifying a unique motor voltage angle and magnitude combination, the MTPA trajectory can be tracked for each reference speed or torque condition, ensuring minimal current and power consumption while enhancing energy efficiency. This approach improves precision under various driving conditions by considering the motor’s dynamic model. The paper also includes a comparative study between the S-DDVC methodology and the traditional FOC strategy within the context of electric vehicle standard driving cycles. Experimental results and quantitative evaluations demonstrate that the S-DDVC strategy is effective and offers higher efficiency for IPMSM drives, making it a viable alternative to current MTPA methods for modern electric vehicle applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric and Hybrid Vehicle TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207