MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404563782 · doi:10.1109/tim.2024.3502720

A Novel Thermo-FET Sensing System for Binary Chemical Solvent Monitoring Applications

2024· article· en· W4404563782 on OpenAlexafffund
Abbas Panahi, Hamed Osouli Tabrizi, Giancarlo Ayala‐Charca, Ahmad Roshanfar, Morteza Ghafar-Zadeh, Yasaman Tahernezhad, Sebastian Magierowski, Ebrahim Ghafar‐Zadeh

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAnalytical Chemistry and Sensors
Canadian institutionsYork University
FundersMitacs
KeywordsBinary numberMaterials scienceComputer scienceElectronic engineeringSolventOptoelectronicsElectrical engineeringChemistryEngineeringMathematicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article introduces a new field-effect transistor (FET)-based sensing system designed to monitor charge/polarity changes during the evaporation of microsize water droplets containing polar substances such as ethanol and methanol. The system utilizes a high transconductance interdigital open-gate junction FET (ID-OGJFET) with a sizeable direct-on-channel sensing area (>16 mm2) in direct contact with the liquid droplet. A new electrofluidic package has also been developed to facilitate sample access on the FET chip, which prevents leakage and connects the sensor to readout systems. An experimental procedure is designed to demonstrate the functionality and applicability of this FET platform sensing system for chemical analysis, such as measuring the concentration of ethanol or methanol in water using the evaporation-based sensing mechanism enabled by the ID-OGJFET. Real-time video capture is employed for monitoring and control. The sensor measures ethanol and methanol concentrations ranging from 0% to 100% with steps of 10% EtOH/MetOH in water, utilizing the evaporation-based sensing mechanism and current output of the ID-OGJFET sensor. The minimum meaningful measured concentration is 1% (v/v) for ethanol and 1.49% (v/v) for methanol. The combined uncertainty analysis of methanol’s concentration predictions ranged from 3.29 to 77.91 s. The expanded uncertainty varied from 6.58 to 155.82 s at a 95% confidence level for concentrations from 0% v/v to 100% with 10% intervals. For ethanol, the combined uncertainties ranged from 4.68 to 98.95 s. The expanded uncertainties, calculated with a coverage factor 2, varied from 9.36 to 197.90 s at a 95% confidence level.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and MeasurementSame topicAnalytical Chemistry and SensorsFrench-language works237,207