MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404565349 · doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000011863

Intraoperative Surgical Guidance for DIEP Flap Harvest Using Augmented Reality

2024· article· en· W4404565349 on OpenAlexaff
Philip Edgcumbe, Tony Jiang, Joseph Khoa Ho, Michael L. Martin, Michael J. Stein, Kathryn V. Isaac

Bibliographic record

VenuePlastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSurgical Simulation and Training
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDIEP flapSurgeryAugmented realityMedicineComputer scienceBreast reconstructionHuman–computer interaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY: Augmented reality systems for surgical navigation provide the capability to project preoperative computed tomographic scans and segmented anatomical structures directly into the surgeon's field of view, along with virtual displays akin to traditional monitors. Using the Meta Quest 3 consumer augmented reality headset, the authors found that it can achieve clinically acceptable accuracy in surgical navigation for deep inferior epigastric perforator operations. Notably, the Quest 3 can operate independently because of a novel registration technique using hand tracking, suitable for use in sterile environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.628
Threshold uncertainty score0.837

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePlastic & Reconstructive SurgerySame topicSurgical Simulation and TrainingFrench-language works237,207