MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Embedding cultural safety in nursing education: A scoping review of strategies and approaches

2024· review· en· W4404572192 on OpenAlexafffund
Rishma Chooniedass, Manuela Reekie, Jacqueline Denison, Adaleena Mercuri, Roula Nawara, Natasha Purcell, Robert Janke

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Professional Nursing · 2024
Typereview
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCultural Competency in Health Care
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus
FundersUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsNursingEmbeddingNurse educationMedicinePsychologyComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Post-secondary institutions can no longer ignore calls to action. Nursing programs are responsible for addressing racism and discrimination by integrating cultural safety into baccalaureate nursing curricula. This scoping review of peer-reviewed literature will reveal how cultural safety is integrated into nursing education across North American post-secondary institutions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 57 records met the criteria for this scoping review between the dates of January 2016 to July 2024. The database search was conducted from November 7, 2021, to November 9, 2021, and then updated on September 17, 2024, to include articles up to and including July 2024, yielding 3444 total search results (1448 from Medline; 1996 from CINAHL). Results were manually screened, and duplicates found were removed. RESULTS: The articles were analyzed thematically to identify strategies for integrating cultural safety into undergraduate nursing education. Four main themes were identified: experiential, theoretical, analytical, and multimodal learning. CONCLUSION: This scoping review highlights nurse educators' role in fostering cultural safety and the importance of considering multiple strategies in curricular development. Strategies include practice experiences, simulations, storytelling, and case-based learning. To provide safe nursing care, education must be inclusive and responsive to people of all races, genders, abilities, and sexual orientations. By applying the concept of cultural safety to nursing education, students are required to acknowledge bias and address issues of power, colonialism, racism, and discrimination that exist in healthcare. These findings provide a foundation for future, more focused research. Further studies could expand on this work by evaluating the effectiveness of specific pedagogical strategies and exploring ways to better support nurse educators in promoting culturally safe learning environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.049
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.123
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: Systematic review
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.260

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0490.123
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.007
Bibliometrics0.0510.043
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0110.010
Open science0.0040.007
Research integrity0.0050.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.197
GPT teacher head0.560
Teacher spread0.363 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Professional NursingSame topicCultural Competency in Health CareFrench-language works237,207