Concept Drift Adaptation in Text Stream Mining Settings: A Systematic Review
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The society produces textual data online in several ways, e.g., via reviews and social media posts. Therefore, numerous researchers have been working on discovering patterns in textual data that can indicate peoples’ opinions, interests, and so on. Most tasks regarding natural language processing are addressed using traditional machine learning methods and static datasets. This setting can lead to several problems, e.g., outdated datasets and models, which degrade in performance over time. This is particularly true regarding concept drift, in which the data distribution changes over time. Furthermore, text streaming scenarios also exhibit further challenges, such as the high speed at which data arrive over time. Models for stream scenarios must adhere to the aforementioned constraints while learning from the stream, thus storing texts for limited periods and consuming low memory. This study presents a systematic literature review regarding concept drift adaptation in text stream scenarios. Considering well-defined criteria, we selected 48 papers published between 2018 and August 2024 to unravel aspects such as text drift categories, detection types, model update mechanisms, stream mining tasks addressed, and text representation methods and their update mechanisms. Furthermore, we discussed drift visualization and simulation and listed real-world datasets used in the selected papers. Finally, we brought forward a discussion on existing works in the area, also highlighting open challenges and future research directions for the community.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it