MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Full-Wave Analysis for Ground Via Placement with Layered Media Integral Equations

2024· article· en· W4404577456 on OpenAlexaff
Alireza Niazi, Vladimir Okhmatovski

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntegral equationComputer scienceMathematical analysisMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As signaling rates exceed 40 Gbps, detailed electromagnetic analysis of the Ground Return Vias (GRVs) becomes essential. Incorrect GRV placement, whether too far apart or poorly arranged in a ball-grid array, can cause a signal via's insertion loss (IL) to increase substantially. Historically, signal integrity (SI) engineers have placed GRVs near signal layer transitions following conventional practices, often without a precise understanding of the optimal quantity and spacing required. This paper proposes accurate full-wave electromagnetic analysis framework for via placement optimization. The method solves the layered medium Mixed Potential Integral Equation (MPIE) coupled with the Surface-Volume-Surface Electric Field Integral Equation (SVS-EFIE), making it suitable for analyzing composite 3D metal/dielectric structures within layered substrates encountered in GRV placement problems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.294

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDynamics and Control of Mechanical SystemsFrench-language works237,207