Pengelompokan Penanganan Resiko Pada Kegiatan Panen Berdasarkan Alat Pelindung Diri Yang digunakan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) is essential for worker safety, especially in oil palm harvesting activities. PT Langkat Nusantara Kepong faces major challenges related to work safety, with analysis showing that work accidents still occur frequently in the Padang Brahrang Plantation. This indicates the need for an in-depth evaluation of the use of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) to reduce the risk of work accidents. By using the clustering method to group data based on the type of Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) used and aims to provide recommendations for optimizing the use of personal protective equipment based on risk management and reducing the incidence of work accidents. From testing the results of cluster 3, cluster 4 and cluster 5 it can be concluded that clustering with 5 clusters provides the most efficient and precise results, followed by 4 clusters, while 3 clusters provide greater variation within clusters, indicating that clustering with fewer clusters is less able to capture subtle differences in the data.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".