MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404578725 · doi:10.62951/modem.v2i4.235

Diagnosis Penyakit Hypertemia Menggunakan Metode Demster Shafer

2024· article· en· W4404578725 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueModem · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEdcuational Technology Systems
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hyperthermia is a condition characterized by symptoms such as dehydration, muscle spasms, dizziness, weakness, nausea, vomiting, and fatigue, which can harm the patient's condition. The causes of hyperthermia can vary, ranging from lack of fluids to excessive physical activity. RSU Putri Bidadari has doctors who are experts in treating various diseases, including hyperthermia. However, several obstacles often occur in the direct consultation process, such as long queues, long distances, limited time, and costs. Therefore, a technology-based system is needed that is able to manage hyperthermia symptom data and help diagnose the disease early, so that patients can get information and early treatment quickly. This method is used to manage the symptoms selected by the patient to determine the possibility of the disease with a high level of confidence. Based on the analysis of the selected symptoms, this system is able to produce the most accurate diagnosis with the case of hyperthermia type Heat exhaustion, with a confidence level of 50.26%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.858
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it