MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404578736 · doi:10.62951/modem.v2i4.231

Diagnosa Penyakit Epilepsi Menggunakan Metode Bayes

2024· article· en· W4404578736 on OpenAlexaff
Achmad Fauzi, Victor Maruli Pakpahan

Bibliographic record

VenueModem · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Mining and Machine Learning Applications
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNaive Bayes classifierComputer scienceNatural language processingStatisticsArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Epilepsy, or apoplexy, is a chronic disease characterized by recurrent seizures and impaired consciousness due to disorders of the central nervous system. In developing countries, including in RSU Putri Bidadari, epilepsy management is often hampered by high consultation costs, resulting in suboptimal quality of treatment and patient recovery. To overcome this challenge, a system is needed that can facilitate the diagnosis and treatment of epilepsy more efficiently. By using this method, RSU Putri Bidadari can improve the precision of epilepsy diagnosis and determine more appropriate treatment steps, despite limited resources. The Bayes method, as a statistical approach, offers a potential solution to improve the accuracy of diagnosis through data-based probability estimation of diseases and symptoms reported by patients such as frequent hunger, thirst, urination, weight loss, vaginal infections, easy fatigue, tingling legs, and blurred vision. The analysis results of the system show an estimated probability of 73% for patients suffering from generalized epilepsy. The Bayes method-based system is expected to help RSU Putri Bidadari in providing more effective treatment and improving the overall quality of life of epilepsy patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModemSame topicData Mining and Machine Learning ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207