MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404578748 · doi:10.62951/repeater.v2i4.206

Pengelompokan Menggunakan Metode Clustering Pada Pola Hidup Pengguna KB

2024· article· en· W4404578748 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRepeater · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Mining and Machine Learning Applications
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster analysisComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Healthy lifestyles are habits of doing something, be it food, healthy behavior so as to avoid the disturbance of all kinds of diseases, both physical and non-physical diseases, as well as birth control users must also strive for a healthy lifestyle, such as managing a healthy diet, rest, exercise, eating vegetables and fruits, doing optimal physical activity, not consuming alcohol, and maintaining a healthy body. In this problem, many family planning users do not pay attention to a healthy lifestyle because they think that the family planning tools used have no risk to health, but the use of family planning has side effects on health such as menstruation is not smooth, the body is obese, the body feels warm or feverish, there are blood clots, nausea, bloating, changes in vision, difficulty in getting back to normal, headaches, and others. To be able to attract the attention of the community in implementing a healthy lifestyle for family planning users, it is very necessary to have a system that can help people in changing their unhealthy lifestyle to a healthier one by grouping family planning user data based on variables that have been determined using the clustering method, to group data on healthy lifestyles for family planning users which later the results of this study can be used as input and guidance for a healthy lifestyle for family planning users, so that family planning users are more careful and have a healthy life. Of the 20 data, there are 3 groups, namely group 1 there are 4 data and group 2 there are 4 data and group 3 there are 12 data from the above results it can be seen that in cluster 3 is a group on family planning users based on a lot with a total of 12 data and is located in the contraceptive type group (X) is injectable birth control, and for the lifestyle group (Y), namely Frequent Night Baths and Risk (Z), namely Decreased Bone Strength.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.926
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it