Deep learning-based denoising for unbiased analysis of morphology and stiffness in amyloid fibrils
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Understanding the morphology of amyloid fibrils is crucial for comprehending the aggregation and degradation mechanisms of abnormal proteins implicated in various diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, type II diabetes, and various forms of amyloidosis. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) stands as the most representative method for studying amyloid fibril morphology. However, obstacles in AFM images, including noise, salt, and amorphous aggregates, often impede accurate sample quantification. In this study, we developed denoising software employing a U-Net deep learning architecture to address this issue. The software efficiently eliminated various impediments that interfere with fibril analysis in noisy AFM images, thereby facilitating precise quantification of amyloid fibrils. We also developed automated fibril analysis technologies using the denoised AFM images, leading to quicker, more precise, and more objective assessments of fibril morphology. Furthermore, we presented a method for fibril stiffness extraction from a modulus image through mask creation based on a denoised height image. Our approach secures time efficiency and precision in analyzing amyloid morphology, and we believe it will significantly advance the currently stagnant research on amyloid-related diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".