MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Building image reconstruction and dimensioning of the envelope from two-dimensional perspective drawings

2024· article· en· W4404580190 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Fisher, L. P. Moreira, A. H. M. Muntasir Billah, Pawan Lingras, Vijay Mago

Bibliographic record

VenueEngineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topic3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsLakehead UniversityUniversity of CalgarySaint Mary's UniversityYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePerspective (graphical)DimensioningEnvelope (radar)Image (mathematics)Computer graphics (images)Engineering drawingArtificial intelligenceComputer visionTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the construction industry, a project typically begins with the creation of two-dimensional (2D) building plans, defining the client’s specifications. Using these plans, a digital three-dimensional (3D) model is developed to visualize the anticipated outcome and to verify the model’s alignment with the client’s expectations. The process of converting from 2D to 3D can become time-intensive if there is a need for modifications or if the project’s overall complexity is high. To enhance efficiency and accuracy, this research introduces an end-to-end framework referred to as BIRD which stands for B uilding I mage R econstruction and D imensioning. BIRD is capable of accepting five 2D perspective drawings of a building as inputs and generating a proportionate 3D model of the building envelope as an output. This is accomplished through the integration of multiple techniques that use convolutional neural networks to extract a refined set of line segments, identify measurements, and align each perspective with the floor plan drawing. The key contributions of this study includes: (1) a novel deep learning model designed for the identification of line segments in building plans; (2) novel algorithms that facilitate the generation of information required for 3D modeling; (3) an end-to-end framework for building reconstruction; and (4) novel performance metrics specifically tailored for the 2D to 3D conversion challenge. The practical application of this research was validated through the use of complete building plans provided by an industry partner. In summary, it was observed that BIRD demonstrated high accuracy in the creation of 3D visualizations, highlighting its real-world efficacy. • A framework is proposed to convert 2D building plans into 3D envelope models. • A novel dual-branch approach is used to extract line segments from building plans. • A novel algorithmic approach works to wrap line segments in three-dimensional spaces. • The framework is ran on building plans from an industry partner with high accuracy. • A preliminary user interface is described to highlight the practical use in industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.599
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEngineering Applications of Artificial IntelligenceSame topic3D Surveying and Cultural HeritageFrench-language works237,207