MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404581022 · doi:10.1016/j.jlb.2024.100252

Analytical results of a tumor-informed digital droplet PCR approach for minimal residual disease

2024· article· en· W4404581022 on OpenAlexaff
Anna Klemantovich, Talia Roseshter, Josiane Lafleur, Cathy Lan, Luca Cavallone, Adriana Aguilar, Mark Basik

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Liquid Biopsy · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation
Canadian institutionsJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMinimal residual diseaseResidualDigital polymerase chain reactionComputer scienceMathematicsMedicineAlgorithmInternal medicineBiologyPolymerase chain reactionGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Tumor-informed assays using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) are very sensitive for the detection of minimal residual disease (MRD). Our unique workflow involves the use of only 5-6 variants per tumor as well as the pre-amplification of both tumor DNA and a normal plasma control prior to the ddPCR assay. Our results in early triple negative breast cancer highlight the very strong prognostic value of this test, with negative predictive values for relapse free survival above 90%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.319
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Liquid BiopsySame topicInnovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques InnovationFrench-language works237,207