A favorable catalytic root for the reduction reaction of SOCl<sub>2</sub> from the constructed CoPc/CuPc composite
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract CoPc, as a catalyst for lithium thionyl chloride (Li/SOCl2) battery, is generally recognized as having catalytic activity, and its catalytic activity can be further improved by compounding it on some substrates. In this paper, CoPc/CuPc with smaller particle size was synthesized by two-step method. It was found that when the product was constructed, not only a loose film could be formed on the surface of carbon cathode, but also a large number of holes could be formed inside it. In addition, the adsorption of SOCl2 by CoPc and CuPc and the surface electrostatic charge distribution was studied by the first-principles density functional theory calculations (DFT). Compared with the bare, the voltage of the battery using the CoPc/CuPc composites as catalyst increased by 0.25 V, and the discharge time was prolonged by 12 min. Observing the morphology after discharge, it can be found that there are many particles around 200 nm on the surface and a large number of particles around 50 nm inside.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".