MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A case report angiomyxoma presenting as Bartholin’s cyst

2024· article· en· W4404591906 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Olumide Gbala, Omotayo Oladele Adeniyi, Ogheneovo Ifedayo Okurumeh, Mathew Olumide Adebisi, Catherine Iyabo Akinsipe, Joshua Taye Ige, Babatunde Ajayi Olofinbiyi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Case Reports and Scientific Images · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrologic and reproductive health conditions
Canadian institutionsBayer (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAggressive angiomyxomaCystMedicineDermatologyRadiologyVulva

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Aggressive angiomyxoma (AA) is a rare, slow-growing mesenchymal tumor that predominantly affects women of reproductive age and often mimics common vulvar conditions like Bartholin’s cysts. We report the case of a 41-year-old woman who presented with a 6-month history of painless, progressively enlarging left vulval swelling. She sought medical attention due to embarrassment and complaints from her husband. A working diagnosis of Bartholin’s cyst was made, and the patient was counselled for surgery. Intraoperatively, findings deviated from the presumed diagnosis, revealing a well-encapsulated gelatinous mass. Marsupialization with wide local excision was performed under face mask anaesthesia, and the excised specimen was sent for histopathological analysis. Histology confirmed AA. This case highlights the importance of a high index of suspicion for atypical vulvar masses, the role of histopathology in confirming the diagnosis, and the need for diligent follow-up to manage the recurrence risks associated with AA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0090.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Case Reports and Scientific ImagesSame topicUrologic and reproductive health conditionsFrench-language works237,207