MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4404600612 · doi:10.1177/27536386241279072

Implementation of a strategy to manage EMS COVID-19 patient disposition with physician consultation: A retrospective descriptive study

2024· article· en· W4404600612 on OpenAlexaffabout
James Summers, Ian R. Drennan, Linda Turner, Maud Huiskamp, W Scott Gorsline, Michael Merko

Bibliographic record

VenueParamedicine · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicEmergency and Acute Care Studies
Canadian institutionsPublic Health OntarioUniversity of TorontoHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDirectiveMedicineMedical emergencyEmergency medical servicesPandemicMedical recordEmergency medicineCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Retrospective cohort studyDescriptive statisticsFamily medicineDiseaseInfectious disease (medical specialty)Surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective: During the COVID-19 pandemic, there was concern that those accessing the 9-1-1 system could overwhelm hospitals. To alleviate this strain, emergency medical services (EMS) in Ontario, Canada, implemented a medical directive allowing paramedics to assess, treat and discharge low acuity patients with suspected COVID-19. Consultation with an EMS physician was required to ensure patient safety. The goal of the study was to measure compliance with and safety of this strategy. Methods: In this retrospective study, we assessed applications of the directive within the catchment of the Sunnybrook Centre for Prehospital Medicine from 1 January 2021, through 31 March 2022. We also monitored whether non-transported patients accessed the 9-1-1 system again within 7 days. Results: Overall, 122 patients were considered by paramedics to have met the COVID-19 medical directive, and, therefore, an EMS physician was contacted. Of these, 53.7% (65/122) were female, and mean age (SD) was 46.8 years (SD 17), range 5 to 96 years. In only 20% (25/122) of cases were all patient assessment findings reported to the EMS physician and within the appropriate ranges specified in the medical directive. The EMS physician approved non-transport in 83% (101/122) of cases. Of those not transported, 12% (12/99) accessed 9-1-1 again within 7 days. Conclusions: We present a non-transport option for patient management, a novel concept within Ontario's paramedic regulatory framework. Assessments provided by paramedics included telephone consultation with EMS physicians. There were no instances in which patient safety was known to have been impacted. Needed is further study of non-transport strategies for low acuity patients that ensure patient safety and study of training strategies to enhance compliance with decision-making tools and joint decision making between paramedics and physicians regarding patient disposition.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.340 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueParamedicineSame topicEmergency and Acute Care StudiesFrench-language works237,207